• 中国科技论文统计源期刊(中国科技核心期刊)
  • 中国医药卫生核心期刊
  • 中国抗癌协会系列期刊

爱威AVE-766与镜检尿液有形成分的结果分析

吴璐思, 黄美群, 刘惠兰, 王发雄, 梁雪冰

吴璐思, 黄美群, 刘惠兰, 王发雄, 梁雪冰. 爱威AVE-766与镜检尿液有形成分的结果分析[J]. 循证医学, 2016, 16(5): 285-288. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2016.05.010
引用本文: 吴璐思, 黄美群, 刘惠兰, 王发雄, 梁雪冰. 爱威AVE-766与镜检尿液有形成分的结果分析[J]. 循证医学, 2016, 16(5): 285-288. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2016.05.010
WU Lu-si, HUANG Mei-qun, LIU Hui-lan, WANG Fa-xiong, LIANG Xue-bing. Results Analysis of Visible Components of AVE-766 Aivin and Microscopic Examination of Urine[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2016, 16(5): 285-288. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2016.05.010
Citation: WU Lu-si, HUANG Mei-qun, LIU Hui-lan, WANG Fa-xiong, LIANG Xue-bing. Results Analysis of Visible Components of AVE-766 Aivin and Microscopic Examination of Urine[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2016, 16(5): 285-288. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2016.05.010

爱威AVE-766与镜检尿液有形成分的结果分析

详细信息
    作者简介:

    吴璐思(1982-),女,澳门氹仔人,技师,从事医学检验技术研究。

    通讯作者:

    黄美群,Tel: 020-83827812, E-mail: h-x-j-09@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R445.12

Results Analysis of Visible Components of AVE-766 Aivin and Microscopic Examination of Urine

  • 摘要: 目的 利用爱威AVE-766尿有形成分分析仪与镜检对尿液中主要参数(红细胞、白细胞、管形、上皮细胞)的结果进行比较,验证爱威AVE-766尿有形成分分析仪的有效性。 方法 选取1 000例住院患者和门诊患者的晨尿标本,由Urisys 2400尿干化学分析仪进行干化学检测,UF-1000i尿有形成分分析仪、AVE-766尿有形成分分析仪、Olympus 显微镜三者进行尿液有形成分检测,然后计算AVE-766检测结果的真阳性率、假阳性率、真阴性率、假阴性率以及符合率。 结果 (1)AVE-766的红细胞真阳性率为100%,真阴性率为99.7%,假阳性率为0.3%,假阴性率为0%;白细胞真阳性率为100%,真阴性率为99.9%,假阳性率为0.1%,假阴性率为0 %;管形真阳性率为100%,真阴性率为100%,假阳性率为0 %,假阴性率为0 %;上皮细胞真阳性率为100%,真阴性率为100%,假阳性率为0 %,假阴性率为0 %。(2)AVE-766与镜检符合率为99.7%。 结论 本室采用AVE-766尿有形成分分析仪对原有复检规则进行验证,误诊率、漏诊率都较低,与人工显微镜镜检结果符合率高,具有临床可操作性和有效性。
    Abstract: Objective To compare the true positive rate, the true negative rate, the false positive rate,the false negative rate of the main parameters of the red blood cells(RBC),the white blood cells(WBC), the CAST, the epithelial cells(ES) in urine, with the re-examination rules for the results of urine routine test in this lab. Method Selecting 1 000 cases of inpatients and outpatients’ morning urine samples; detecting by Urisys 2400 urine dry chemistry analyzer, examining the urine visible components with the UF-1000i urine visible components analyzer, urine AVE-766 tangible composition analyzer, Olympus microscopy; then calculating the true positive rate, false positive rate, true negative rate, false negative rate, and the coincidence rate of the results detected by AVE-766. Results (1) with AVE-766, the RBC’s true positive rate was 100%, and the true negative rate was 99.7%; the false positive rate was 0.3%, the false negative rate was 0%; WBC’s true positive rate was 100%, and the true negative rate was 99.9%; the false positive rate was 0.1%, but the false negative rate was 0%; CAST’s true positive rate was 100%, and the true negative rate was 100%; but the false positive rate was 0%, and the false negative rate was 0%; EC’s true positive rate was 100%; the true negative rate was 100%; the false positive rate was 0%, and the false negative rate was 0%. (2)The coincidence rate for AVE-766 and microscopic examination was 99.7%. Conclusion After the lab adopted AVE-766 urine visible components analyzer experiment totest on the original rules of the re-examination, the rates of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis were low, andits coincidence rate with manual microscopy results was high. Thus AVE-766 is clinically feasible and effective.
  • [1] 杨学敏,李光迪,赵有利. 尿液流水线尿沉渣检验结果复检标准的探讨[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2011,32(21): 2446-2449.
    [2] 叶应妩,王毓三,申子俞. 全国临床检验操作规则[M]. 3版. 南京: 东南大学出版社,2006: 293-295.
    [3] 丛玉隆,马骏龙,张时民,等. 尿液细胞成分定量分析方法学研究[J]. 中华检验医学杂志,2006, 29(3): 211-214.
    [4] 左新华. AVE762沉渣分析仪、尿干化学分析仪及尿沉渣镜检联合检测的临床应用价值[J]. 实验与检验医学,2010, 28(1): 75-78.
    [5] 杨学敏,李光迪,赵有利. 不同原理尿液分析仪检测尿有形成分结果比较及显微镜复检规则探讨[J]. 国际检验医学杂志,2012, 33(6): 671-675.
    [6] 奚焕琴. AVE-762A尿液分析仪与显微镜对尿中红细胞及白细胞检测结果分析[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2012, 9(18): 2370-2371.
    [7] 金胜航,曹寒沁,胡晓,等. AVE-763尿液有形成分分析仪“机器视觉”技术的评价[J]. 浙江检验医学,2010, 8(2): 9-11.
    [8] 蔡瑜. 尿沉渣分析仪、尿干化学分析仪及光学显微镜检测尿液红细胞、白细胞结果比较[J]. 国际检验医学杂志, 2012, 33(12): 1472-1473.
    [9] 李绍特. AVE-765C尿沉渣分析仪检测结果准确性评价[J]. 中国保健营养,2013,2: 214.
    [10] 王刚,张延京,李世亮. 三种不同方法检测尿液有形成分定量分析的比较[J]. 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志, 2014, 28(6): 488-490.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  255
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  296
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-07-25
  • 发布日期:  2016-10-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回