简易BH3分析法在血液肿瘤药敏筛选的初步探索

    Preliminary Exploration of Simple BH3 Profiling in Screening Drug Susceptibility of Blood Tumors

    • 摘要:
      目的 建立一种血液肿瘤BCL-2抗凋亡蛋白抑制剂药敏筛选的简易BH3分析法。
      方法 建立基于显微镜和JC-1染色的BH3分析方法,通过BH3-only模拟肽描绘K562、NB4细胞系BCL-2家族抗凋亡蛋白依赖谱,应用聚合酶链式反应(polymerase chain reaction,PCR)加以验证;回溯临床治疗疗效,检验该方法对临床样本BH3药敏分析结果的符合情况。
      结果 BH3分析结果显示NB4对抗凋亡蛋白的依赖程度依次为BCL2>MC1-1>BCL-XL;K562的依赖程度依次为BCL-XL>MC1-1>BCL2。PCR分析BCL-2家族基因表达量显示,K562抗凋亡蛋白MCL-1、BCL2、BCL-XL相对表达程度较高,BH3-only促凋亡蛋白中BIM、PUMA、NOXA高表达而HRK低表达,细胞抗凋亡能力更依赖于BCL-XL;NB4抗凋亡蛋白BCL-XL表达明显低于MCL-1与BCL-2,BH3-only促凋亡蛋白NOXA低表达,细胞抗凋亡更依赖于MCL-1与BCL-2而非BCL-XL,与BH3分析结果相符。对连续6例血液肿瘤患者骨髓进行BH3分析,结果显示6例患者均对HRK(BCL-XL抑制物)、VEN(BCL-2抑制物)不敏感;4例患者(例1~3,例5)对NOXA(MCL-1抑制物)表现为敏感,2例(例4、例6)的敏感度较低(<50%)。药敏预测结果显示6例患者均对BCL-2抑制剂耐药,例1~3、例5患者对MCL1抑制剂敏感,例4和例6对MCL1抑制剂可能耐药。回溯临床用药效果(4~6个疗程)显示例1~5患者对BCL-2抑制剂相关方案治疗无效,考虑与BCL-2抑制剂不敏感有关,例5更换西达苯胺治疗有效,例4和例6患者西达苯胺相关方案疗效不佳,考虑与MCL-1抑制物不敏感有关,上述临床结局与BH3预测结果一致。
      结论 基于荧光显微镜和JC-1染色的BH3分析是简便可行的,可用于检测血液肿瘤细胞对不同抗凋亡蛋白的依赖性,从而为BCL-2家族相关抑制剂的选择提供证据。

       

      Abstract:
      Objective To establish a simple BH3 profiling for drug-sensitive screening of anti-apoptotic protein inhibitors of the BCL-2 family in blood tumors.
      Method To establish the BH3 profiling method based on the microscope and JC-1 staining, describe the dependence of K562 and NB4 cell lines on anti-apoptotic proteins of the BCL-2 family by BH3-only simulated peptide, and verify it by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Clinical drug efficacy was retrospectively reviewed to check the conformity of BH3 drug sensitivity analysis results.
      Results BH3 profiling results showed that the anti-apoptotic protein dependence of the NB4 cell line was BCL2 > MC1-1 > BCL-XL; the K562 cell line was BCL-XL > MC1-1 > BCL2. PCR analysis of BCL-2 family expression showed that anti-apoptotic proteins MCL-1, BCL2, and BCL-XL were highly expressed in K562, while BIM, NOXA, and PUMA were highly expressed in BH3-only protein and HRK was low. The anti-apoptotic ability of cells depended more on BCL-XL. In NB4, the anti-apoptotic protein BCL-XL was significantly lower than MCL-1 and BCL-2, while NOXA in BH3-only protein was lower. NB4 cells were more dependent on MCL-1 and BCL-2 than BCL-XL; Which was consistent with BH3 profiling results. Bone marrow BH3 profiling results of 6 patients with hematologic tumors showed that HRK (BCL-XL inhibitor) and VEN (BCL-2 inhibitor) were not sensitive. NOXA (MCL-1 inhibitor) was sensitive to examples 1, 2, 3 and 5, while the sensitivity of examples 4 and 6 was low (< 50%). It was speculated that all 6 cases were resistant to BCL-2 inhibitor; Cases 1, 2, 3 and 5 were sensitive to MCL1 inhibitor, and cases 4 and 6 might be resistant to MCL1 inhibitor. Retrospective clinical efficacy (4~6 sessions): Cases 1~5 were not sensitive to the treatment regimen containing BCL-2 inhibitor, which was considered to be related to insensitivity to BCL-2 inhibitor. Chidamide was effective in case 5, but not effective in cases 4 and 6, which were considered to be related to MCL-1 inhibitor insensitivity. The above clinical outcomes were consistent with the predicted results of BH3 profiling.
      Conclusions BH3 profiling based on fluorescence microscopy and JC-1 staining is simple and feasible and can be used to detect the dependence of blood tumor cells on different anti-apoptotic proteins, thus providing evidence for the selection of inhibitors related to the Bcl-2 family.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回