张晓春, 王思云, 王秋实, 王淑侠. 18F-FDG PET/CT在良恶性胰腺囊性病变中的诊断价值[J]. 循证医学, 2016, 16(6): 342-347. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2016.06.011
    引用本文: 张晓春, 王思云, 王秋实, 王淑侠. 18F-FDG PET/CT在良恶性胰腺囊性病变中的诊断价值[J]. 循证医学, 2016, 16(6): 342-347. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2016.06.011
    ZHANG Xiao-chun, WANG Si-yun, WANG Qiu-shi, WANG Shu-xia. The Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Pancreaticcystic Lesions[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2016, 16(6): 342-347. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2016.06.011
    Citation: ZHANG Xiao-chun, WANG Si-yun, WANG Qiu-shi, WANG Shu-xia. The Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Pancreaticcystic Lesions[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2016, 16(6): 342-347. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2016.06.011

    18F-FDG PET/CT在良恶性胰腺囊性病变中的诊断价值

    The Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Pancreaticcystic Lesions

    • 摘要: 目的 评价18F-FDG PET/CT鉴别良恶性胰腺囊性病变的能力。 方法 回顾2008年7月至2016年3月行18F-FDG PET/CT成像的胰腺囊性病变患者的数据。测量病变的大小及标准化摄取值SUVmax。用SPSS19.0软件进行统计学分析。 结果 共获得患者55例。良性病变29例,恶性病变23例,交界性病变3例。对于直径<3 cm病变,良恶性病变SUVmax间的差异没有统计学意义(2.91±2.08) vs.(2.48±1.10),P=0.601。对于直径≥3 cm病变,良恶性病变SUVmax间的差异有统计学意义(2.71±2.06) vs. (6.56±3.95),P=0.001。以SUVmax=3.0作为阈值,18F-FDG PET/CT对37例直径≥3 cm胰腺囊性病变诊断的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确度分别为89%、84%、84%、89%、86%。 结论 18F-FDG PET/CT用于良性与恶性胰腺囊性病变的鉴别时,对于直径<3 cm病变无鉴别价值,对于直径≥3 cm病变有较好的鉴别价值。

       

      Abstract: Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic capability of 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating benign from malignant pancreaticcystic lesions. Methods Between July 2008 and March 2016, all patients with pancreatic cystic lesions that had 18F-FDG PET/CT were reviewed. The sizes and maximum standardized uptake values(SUVmax) of the pancreatic cystic lesions were measured. The definition of the gold standard was based on histopathologic findings(n=52) and operative findings without biopsy(n=1) and percutaneous biopsy(n=2). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0. Results A total of 55 patients with pancreatic cystic lesions were enrolled for the study. Of all patients, 29 had benign lesions but 26 were assigned to the malignant group (23 with malignant neoplasms, 3 with borderline neoplasms). 18 patients had cystic lesions that were smaller than 3 cm in diameter (8 with malignant neoplasms, 10 with benign lesions), and 37 patients had cystic lesions 3 cm in diameter or bigger(18 with malignant neoplasms, 19 with benign lesions). For lesions that was smaller than 3 cms in the diameter, SUVmax between malignant and benign lesions were of no statistical difference(2.91±2.08) vs. (2.48±1.10), P=0.601. For lesions that was 3 cm in the diameter or bigger, SUVmax was significantly higher in malignant than in benign lesions(2.71±2.06) vs. (6.56±3.95), P=0.001. The optimal cut off value of SUVmax for differentiating benign from malignant pancreatic cystic lesions was 3.0, which was determined by receiver-operating- characteristic analysis using the highest Youden index. For all of the lesions, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT indetecting malignant cystic lesions were 65%, 79%, 74%, 72% and 73%, respectively. For 37 lesions that was 3 cm s in the diameter or bigger, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicti vevalues, and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT indetecting malignant cystic lesions were 89%, 84%, 84%, 89% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion 18F-FDG PET/CT is an accurate imaging modality for differentiating between benign and malignant pancreatic cystlesions that were 3 cm in the diameter or bigger, and which is not accurate for lesions that were smaller than 3 cm in the diameter.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回