陈秀梅, 傅睿, 邓倩昀, 严红虹, 杨衿记, 张绪超, 周清, 乔贵宾, 杨学宁, 潘燚, 李瑞娜, 雷丽婵, 赵舜珍, 吴健红, 甘彬, 钟文昭, 侯铁英, 吴一龙. COVID-19疫情期间一线医护人员的感染风险[J]. 循证医学, 2021, 21(1): 54-59. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2021.01.014
    引用本文: 陈秀梅, 傅睿, 邓倩昀, 严红虹, 杨衿记, 张绪超, 周清, 乔贵宾, 杨学宁, 潘燚, 李瑞娜, 雷丽婵, 赵舜珍, 吴健红, 甘彬, 钟文昭, 侯铁英, 吴一龙. COVID-19疫情期间一线医护人员的感染风险[J]. 循证医学, 2021, 21(1): 54-59. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2021.01.014
    CHEN Xiu-mei, FU Rui, DENG Qian-yun, YAN Hong-hong, YANG Jin-ji, ZHANG Xu-chao, ZHOU Qing, QIAO Gui-bin, YANG Xue-ning, PAN Yi, LI Rui-na, LEI Li-chan, ZHAO Shun-zhen, WU Jian-hong, GAN Bin, ZHONG Wen-zhao, HOU Tie-ying, WU Yi-long. Risk of COVID-19 among Front-Line Health-Care Workers During The COVID-19 Pandemic[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2021, 21(1): 54-59. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2021.01.014
    Citation: CHEN Xiu-mei, FU Rui, DENG Qian-yun, YAN Hong-hong, YANG Jin-ji, ZHANG Xu-chao, ZHOU Qing, QIAO Gui-bin, YANG Xue-ning, PAN Yi, LI Rui-na, LEI Li-chan, ZHAO Shun-zhen, WU Jian-hong, GAN Bin, ZHONG Wen-zhao, HOU Tie-ying, WU Yi-long. Risk of COVID-19 among Front-Line Health-Care Workers During The COVID-19 Pandemic[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2021, 21(1): 54-59. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2021.01.014

    COVID-19疫情期间一线医护人员的感染风险

    Risk of COVID-19 among Front-Line Health-Care Workers During The COVID-19 Pandemic

    • 摘要: 目的 一线医护人员在COVID-19(coronavirus disease 2019)疫情期间的SARS-CoV-2(severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2)的血清学特征仍然不明确。尚不清楚他们是否已建立保护性免疫。 方法 我们对一家COVID-19定点收治医院肿瘤中心的所有医护人员进行了SARS-CoV-2抗体检测及咽拭子核酸检测。所有医护人员均按照医院要求配备了相应的个人防护设备。使用两种胶体金法的抗体检测试剂盒(Wondfo,Innovita)进行抗体检测。 结果 受试者的工作场所包括隔离病房(n=18,6.40%),发热门诊(n=11,3.9%),普通病房(n=221,78.9%)以及行政和后勤部门(n=30,10.7%)。两种抗体检测的结果在大多数受试者中(n=278,99.2%)呈阴性。一名员工(0.36%)的IgG/IgM(Wondfo)呈弱阳性,而IgG/IgM(Innovita)呈阴性。另一名员工(0.36%)的IgM(Innovita)呈弱阳性,而IgG(Innovita)和IgG/IgM(Wondfo)呈阴性。两人随后的动态血清学检测结果均为阴性。所有受试者的核酸检测结果也均呈阴性。 结论 该中心的个人防护装备分级措施可有效保护人员免受COVID-19侵害。即使员工处于高风险环境中并与曾与感染患者密切接触,他们也没有受到感染,但同时也没有建立保护性免疫。因此,医护人员仍然容易受到COVID-19伤害,应严格保持个人防护。

       

      Abstract: Objective Serologic features of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among front-line health-care workers during the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic remain poorly characterized. It is still unclear whether they have established protective immunity. Methods The medical and administrative staff, who were equipped with different personal protective equipment(PPE) in accordance with the institutional guidelines, in a cancer center affiliated to a designated hospital for COVID-19 during the pandemic, were tested for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 using two assay kits (Wondfo and Innovita), employing the colloidal gold method. Nasopharyngeal swabs for all participants were also collected. Results The participants included personnel in the isolation ward area (n=18, 6.40%), fever clinics (n=11, 3.9%), general wards (n=221, 78.9%), and administrative and logistic departments (n=30, 10.7%). Most participants (n=278, 99.2%) were tested negative on both assays. One participant (0.36%) was tested weakly positive for IgG/IgM (Wondfo) and negative for IgG and IgM (Innovita), whereas another participant (0.36%) was tested weakly positive for IgM and negative for IgG (Innovita) and IgG/IgM (Wondofo). Both participants tested negative in the dynamic serological test were conducted later. Nucleic acid testing for all participants were negative. Conclusions The current hierarchical PPE at this cancer center was effective in protecting personnel from COVID-19. Staff did not get infection or establish protective immunity even they were exposed in high-risk environments and close contacted with infected patients. Therefore, healthcare personnel remain vulnerable and should strictly maintain personal protection.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回