黄殿毅, 刘平平, 方良毅, 龙亮, 吕凤泉, 岑伟健, 曾子君. 一种基于计划床值的摆位方法在保乳术后调强放疗中的应用[J]. 循证医学, 2022, 22(4): 217-223. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2022.04.006
    引用本文: 黄殿毅, 刘平平, 方良毅, 龙亮, 吕凤泉, 岑伟健, 曾子君. 一种基于计划床值的摆位方法在保乳术后调强放疗中的应用[J]. 循证医学, 2022, 22(4): 217-223. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2022.04.006
    HUANG Dian-yi, LIU Ping-ping, FANG Liang-yi, LONG Liang, LV Feng-quan, CEN Wei-jian, ZENG Zi-jun. Application of Setup Method Based on Planned Bed Value in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2022, 22(4): 217-223. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2022.04.006
    Citation: HUANG Dian-yi, LIU Ping-ping, FANG Liang-yi, LONG Liang, LV Feng-quan, CEN Wei-jian, ZENG Zi-jun. Application of Setup Method Based on Planned Bed Value in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2022, 22(4): 217-223. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2022.04.006

    一种基于计划床值的摆位方法在保乳术后调强放疗中的应用

    Application of Setup Method Based on Planned Bed Value in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery

    • 摘要: 目的 为提高在Orfit板+体表标线固定技术下的乳腺癌保乳术后调强放疗患者摆位治疗精准度,提出一种基于计划床值的改良摆位方法。 方法 选取29例在Orfit板+体表标线固定技术下接受保乳术后调强放疗病例,同一患者分别按体表治疗标记点(常规摆位组)与计划床值(试验摆位组)进行摆位,并通过锥形束计算机断层扫描(cone-beam computed tomography,CBCT)自动配准方式获取两组在左右(lateral,Lat)方向、头脚(longitudinal,Lng)方向和腹背(vertical,Vrt)方向的配准误差,同时收集患者治疗前的体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、乳房最大厚度值,与各方向误差值进行相关性Pearson分析。 结果 常规摆位组在左右(Lat)方向、头脚(Lng)方向和腹背(Vrt)方向的摆位误差分别为(-0.01±0.32)cm、(-0.03±0.23)cm和(-0.20±0.38)cm;试验摆位组摆位误差依次为(-0.04±0.31)cm、(0.04±0.22)cm和(-0.06±0.23)cm。两组在头脚(Lng)方向和腹背(Vrt)方向的摆位误差(P<0.05)有统计学意义;而左右(Lat)方向的(P>0.05)无统计学意义。BMI值与常规摆位误差存在相关性腹背(Vrt)方向r=-0.435,P=0.018,与试验组各方向摆位误差均不存在相关(P>0.05);乳房厚度与两组各方向摆位误差均不存在相关(P>0.05)。 结论 计划床值摆位精度优于体表治疗标记点,提示对Orfit板+体表标线固定技术下的保乳术后患者放疗具有潜在的临床获益。

       

      Abstract: Objective The setup method based on planned bed value was proposed to improve setup accuracy under Orfit plate and body surface fixation of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) patients of breast-conserving surgery. Methods A total of 29 cases of IMRT patients after breast-conserving surgery were selected and all patients were fixed with body surface fixation and Orfit in the supine position. The same patient was setup according to the skin markers (conventional group) and the planned bed value (experimental group) respectively. All patients after cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan were matched with the CT images by rigid registration and the setup errors in three directions lateral(Lat), longitudinal (Lng), and vertical (Vrt) were obtained. Meanwhile, the body mass index (BMI) value and the maximum breast thickness value before treatment were collected for correlation Pearson analysis with the difference of all directions. Results The setup errors in the lateral direction, longitudinal direction, and vertical direction of the conventional group were (-0.01±0.32) cm, (-0.03± 0.23) cm, and (-0.20±0.38) cm respectively. The setup errors of the experimental group were (-0.04±0.31) cm, (0.04±0.22) cm, and (-0.06±0.23) cm successively. The setup errors in the Lng direction and Vrt direction between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in the Lat direction (P>0.05). BMI value was correlated with the setup errors of the conventional group (Vrt direction r=-0.435, P=0.018) but not correlated with the setup errors of the experimental group (P>0.05). Breast thickness was not correlated with the directional pendulum errors in both groups (P>0.05). Conclusions The setup accuracy of the planned bed value was better than skin markers, which indicated that it might have potential clinical benefits for breast cancer patients with radiotherapy under Orfit plate body surface fixation.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回