李冉, 顾晓明. 急性智齿冠周炎即刻拔牙与保守治疗疗效的系统评价[J]. 循证医学, 2006, 6(5): 285-290. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2006.05.009
    引用本文: 李冉, 顾晓明. 急性智齿冠周炎即刻拔牙与保守治疗疗效的系统评价[J]. 循证医学, 2006, 6(5): 285-290. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2006.05.009
    LI Ran, GU Xiao-ming. A Systematic Review of the Practicability of Immediate Removal of Mandibular Third Molar in the Presence of Pericoronitis Comparing with Traditional Treatment[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2006, 6(5): 285-290. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2006.05.009
    Citation: LI Ran, GU Xiao-ming. A Systematic Review of the Practicability of Immediate Removal of Mandibular Third Molar in the Presence of Pericoronitis Comparing with Traditional Treatment[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2006, 6(5): 285-290. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2006.05.009

    急性智齿冠周炎即刻拔牙与保守治疗疗效的系统评价

    A Systematic Review of the Practicability of Immediate Removal of Mandibular Third Molar in the Presence of Pericoronitis Comparing with Traditional Treatment

    • 摘要: 目的 利用循证医学系统综述的方法,比较急性冠周炎智齿即刻拔除术后不适和并发症是否多于保守治疗,为智齿冠周炎急性期拔牙提供理论依据.方法 利用系统综述和Meta分析方法,对国内1985-2005年间有关急性智齿冠周炎即刻拔牙疗效的原始数据完整的文献进行定量综合分析.结果 即刻拔牙与保守治疗术后相比较,前者48小时内疼痛的相对危险度和可信区间分别为0.24和0.12~0.50.即刻拔牙术后肿胀和张口受限缓解率高于保守治疗组.两种治疗方法疗程有差异,即刻拔牙疗程短于保守治疗.冠周炎急性期拔牙并未发生严重并发症.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回