刘少杰, 任镜清, 唐嘉慧, 杨小红, 朱宣进. 国人局部麻醉与硬膜外麻醉对腹股沟疝无张力修补术影响的Meta分析[J]. 循证医学, 2014, 14(3): 166-171. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2014.03.009
    引用本文: 刘少杰, 任镜清, 唐嘉慧, 杨小红, 朱宣进. 国人局部麻醉与硬膜外麻醉对腹股沟疝无张力修补术影响的Meta分析[J]. 循证医学, 2014, 14(3): 166-171. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2014.03.009
    LIU Shao-jie, REN Jing-qing, TANG Jia-hui, YANG Xiao-hong, ZHU Xuan-jin. Domestic Tension Free Inguinal Hernia Repair with Local Anesthesia and Epidural Anesthesia: A Meta Analysis[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2014, 14(3): 166-171. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2014.03.009
    Citation: LIU Shao-jie, REN Jing-qing, TANG Jia-hui, YANG Xiao-hong, ZHU Xuan-jin. Domestic Tension Free Inguinal Hernia Repair with Local Anesthesia and Epidural Anesthesia: A Meta Analysis[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2014, 14(3): 166-171. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2014.03.009

    国人局部麻醉与硬膜外麻醉对腹股沟疝无张力修补术影响的Meta分析

    Domestic Tension Free Inguinal Hernia Repair with Local Anesthesia and Epidural Anesthesia: A Meta Analysis

    • 摘要: 目的 比较局部麻醉和硬膜外麻醉下行腹股沟疝无张力修补术的疗效。 方法 检索 PubMed、EMBASE、MEDLINE、中国学术期刊网全文数据库收录的公开发表与研究目的相关的临床随机对照研究,纳入符合条件的研究,对数据进行Meta分析。评价指标包括手术时间、住院时间、治疗费用、术后伤口疼痛发生率及术后复发率。 结果 有19个研究,共4 516例患者纳入分析,局麻组2 330例,硬膜外麻醉组2 186例。Meta分析显示,局麻组在手术时间加权均数差-5.36 min,95%可信区间(-5.67,-5.06)min,P<0.000 01、住院时间加权均数差-2.82 d,95%可信区间(-2.89,-2.75)d,P<0.000 01、治疗费用加权均数差-998.83元,95%可信区间 (-1 004.96,-992.71)元,P<0.000 01、术后疼痛发生率优势比0.67,95%可信区间(0.49,0.91),P=0.01方面优于硬膜外麻醉组,两组复发率无明显差异危险比1.28,95%可信区间(0.54,3.01),P=0.58。 结论 与硬膜外麻醉相比,局麻下行腹股沟无张力疝修补术具有手术时间短、住院时间短、费用低、术后疼痛轻的优点,两种麻醉方法对术后复发率无影响。

       

      Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effects of local anesthesia and epidural anesthesia in tension free inguinal hernia repair. Methods Electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Chinese Academic Journal Full-text Database were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the effects of local anesthesia and epidural anesthesia in tension free inguinal hernia repair. Evaluation indicators were included: operation time, length of hospital stay, cost, rate of wound pain and recurrence. Results There are 19 RCTs, 4 516 patients included in the meta analysis, 2 330 cases in local anesthesia group and 2 186 cases in epidural anesthesia group. Meta analysis indicated that operation time WMD=-5.36 min, 95%CI (-5.67, -5.06) min, P< 0.000 01, length of hospital stay WMD= -2.82 d, 95%CI (-2.89, -2.75)d, P< 0.000 01, cost WMD=-998.83 yuan, 95%CI (-1 004.96, -992.71) yuan, P< 0.000 01, and rate of wound pain OR=0.67, 95%CI (0.49, 0.91), P=0.01 in local anesthesia group were better than those in epidural group. But recurrence was not significant differencesRR=1.28, 95%CI (0.54, 3.01), P=0.58. Conclusion Compare to epidural anesthesia, tension free inguinal hernia repair with local anesthesia has the merit of shorter operation time, shorter length of hospital stay, lower cost,less wound pain and the same recurrence.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回