LU Hong-lian, LIU Si-yang, ZHOU Jia-ying, JIE Guang-ling, WU Yi-long. The Response of EGFR Non-Exons-18-21-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer to Different Treatments[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2022, 22(3): 176-186. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2022.03.008
    Citation: LU Hong-lian, LIU Si-yang, ZHOU Jia-ying, JIE Guang-ling, WU Yi-long. The Response of EGFR Non-Exons-18-21-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer to Different Treatments[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2022, 22(3): 176-186. DOI: 10.12019/j.issn.1671-5144.2022.03.008

    The Response of EGFR Non-Exons-18-21-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer to Different Treatments

    • Objective To analyze the response of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) non-exons-18-21-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy. Methods This study collected the clinical data of 35 patients with EGFR non-exons-18-21 pure mutation and 65 patients with EGFR non-exons-18-21 compound mutation in the next generation sequencing (NGS) database of Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute (GLCI) from 2016 to 2020, and collected the clinical data of 567 patients with EGFR exons-18-21 mutation in GLCI from 2016 to 2019. Clinicopathological characteristics of the three groups were compared, and the response of patients with EGFR non-exons-18-21 mutations to different treatments were analyzed. Results The clinicopathological characteristics of the EGFR non-exons-18-21 compound mutation group were consistent with those of the EGFR exons-18-21 mutation group, but showed significant differences in gender (P<0.001), smoking history (P<0.001), and pathological type (P<0.001) compared with those of the EGFR non-exons-18-21 pure mutation group. In the EGFR non-exons-18-21 compound mutation group, the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients receiving first- or second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (n=26) was 9.4 months, which was no significant difference from that of patients with EGFR exons-18-21 mutation with or without propensity score matching (PSM) (before PSM: P=0.76; after PSM: P=0.76). And the PFS of patients receiving third-generation EGFR-TKIs (n=23) was 9.5 months, which was also no significant difference from that of patients with EGFR exons-18-21 mutation with or without PSM (before PSM: P=0.23; after PSM: P=0.19). In EGFR non-exons-18-21 pure mutation group, the PFS of patients receiving immunotherapy and chemotherapy were 4.2 months and 5.4 months, respectively. Conclusions After NGS detected EGFR non-exons-18-21 mutation, patients with EGFR non-exons-18-21 compound mutations could also benefit from first- to third-generation EGFR-TKIs. And the response of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with EGFR non-exons-18-21 pure mutations were similar to that of EGFR wild-type NSCLC. In the future, we need to explore the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR non-exons-18-21 pure mutated NSCLC.
    • loading

    Catalog

      Turn off MathJax
      Article Contents

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return