A Comparative Study of Hemodynamic Support with Impella 2.5 Versus Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

JIN  Li-jun; WANG  Zong-tao

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2013.06.011

JIN Li-jun, WANG Zong-tao. A Comparative Study of Hemodynamic Support with Impella 2.5 Versus Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2013, 13(6): 330-333. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2013.06.011

Citation:

JIN Li-jun, WANG Zong-tao. A Comparative Study of Hemodynamic Support with Impella 2.5 Versus Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2013, 13(6): 330-333. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2013.06.011

Citation:

JIN Li-jun, WANG Zong-tao. A Comparative Study of Hemodynamic Support with Impella 2.5 Versus Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2013, 13(6): 330-333. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2013.06.011

A Comparative Study of Hemodynamic Support with Impella 2.5 Versus Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

FullText(HTML)

References (7)

A Comparative Study of Hemodynamic Support with Impella 2.5 Versus Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content