• 中国科技论文统计源期刊(中国科技核心期刊)
  • 中国医药卫生核心期刊
  • 中国抗癌协会系列期刊

连接酶链反应检测沙眼衣原体的准确性Meta分析

葛龙, 陈婵, 梁莉, 安妮, 王小琴, 田金徽

葛龙, 陈婵, 梁莉, 安妮, 王小琴, 田金徽. 连接酶链反应检测沙眼衣原体的准确性Meta分析[J]. 循证医学, 2012, 12(4): 217-223. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2012.04.012
引用本文: 葛龙, 陈婵, 梁莉, 安妮, 王小琴, 田金徽. 连接酶链反应检测沙眼衣原体的准确性Meta分析[J]. 循证医学, 2012, 12(4): 217-223. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2012.04.012
GE Long, CHEN Chan, LIANG Li, AN Ni, WANG Xiao-qin, TIAN Jin-hui. The Accuracy for Chlamydia Trachomatis Test by Ligase Chain Reaction: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2012, 12(4): 217-223. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2012.04.012
Citation: GE Long, CHEN Chan, LIANG Li, AN Ni, WANG Xiao-qin, TIAN Jin-hui. The Accuracy for Chlamydia Trachomatis Test by Ligase Chain Reaction: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2012, 12(4): 217-223. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2012.04.012

连接酶链反应检测沙眼衣原体的准确性Meta分析

基金项目: 2011年度兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助项目(lzujbky-2011-133)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    葛龙(1988-), 男, 贵州毕节人, 兰州大学基础医学院 2009 级医学检验专业本科生, 主要研究方向为循证医学。

    通讯作者:

    田金徽,Tel: 0931-8915076, E-mail: tianjh@lzu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: R374+.1

The Accuracy for Chlamydia Trachomatis Test by Ligase Chain Reaction: A Meta-Analysis

  • 摘要: 目的 评价连接酶链反应技术与培养法诊断沙眼衣原体的准确性。 方法 计算机检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国期刊全文数据库和万方数据库等,收集连接酶链反应诊断沙眼衣原体的试验研究,依据QUADAS质量评价标准评价纳入研究的质量,采用MetaAnalyst软件进行Meta分析。 结果 共纳入22个研究,共16 073例受试者。Meta分析结果显示: 与诊断沙眼衣原体感染的“金标准”细胞培养相比,连接酶链反应诊断沙眼衣原体感染的合并敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、诊断比值比和综合受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.934(95%可信区间0.891~0.961)、0.983(95%可信区间0.972~0.990)、52.88(95%可信区间32.297~86.583)、0.069(95%可信区间0.043~0.110),1 234.549(95%可信区间545.900 ~2 791.925)和0.986。 结论 连接酶链反应可作为确诊沙眼衣原体感染的一项新技术,在检测沙眼衣原体感染中有着重要意义。
    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the accuracy of ligase chain reaction and culture for Chlamydia trachomatis test. Methods Systematic and comprehensive literatures were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang database, et al. The studies of ligase chain reaction diagnosis for Chlamydia trachomatis were included. The quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) items were used to assess the quality of the included studies. The MetaAnalyst software was used to analyze the data. Results A total of 22 studies involving 16 073 participants were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the cell culture, which used considered as gold standard, the ligase chain reaction indicating a higher level of overall accuracy, the summary sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, that the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were 0.934(95%CI 0.891~0.961), 0.983(95%CI 0.972~0.990), 52.88(95%CI 32.297~86.583), 0.069(95%CI 0.043~0.110), 1 234.549(95%CI 545.900~2 791.925) and 0.986, respectively. Conclusion The ligase chain could use as a new technology for Chlamydia trachomatis infection diagnosed, and may be of benefit for testing Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
  • [1] 杨江山,高英堂,刘毅. 连接酶链反应诊断沙眼衣原体的研究进展[J]. 国外医学皮肤性病学分册, 1997,23(5): 283-285.
    [2] 陈凤平,关加廉. 连接酶链反应与培养法检测沙眼衣原体的比较[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2000,23(2): 81-82.
    [3] Battaglia M, Bucher H, Egger M, et al. The Bayes library of diagnostic studies and reviews. 2nd edition[M]. 2002.
    [4] Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2003,3: 25.
    [5] Lee HH, Chernesky MA, Schachter J, et al. Diagnosis of chlamydla trachomatls genltourlnary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine[J]. Lancet, 1995,345 (8944): 213-216.
    [6] Stary A, Schuh E, Kerschbaumer M, et al. Performance of transcription-mediated amplification and ligase chain reaction assays for detection of chlamydial infection in urogenital samples obtained by invasive and noninvasive methods[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1998,36(9): 2666-2670.
    [7] Johnson RE, Green TA, Schachter J, et al. Evaluation of nucleic acid amplification tests as reference tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in asymptomatic men[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2000,38(12): 4382-4386.
    [8] Bassiri M, Hu HY, Domeika MA, et al. Detection of chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1995,33(4): 898-900.
    [9] van Doornum GJ, Buimer M, Prins M, et al. Detection of chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from men and women by ligase chain reaction[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1995,33(8): 2042-2047.
    [10] Buimer M, van Doornum GJ, Ching S, et al. Detection of chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae by ligase chain reaction-based assays with clinical specimens from various sites: Implications for diagnostic testing and screening[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1996,34(10): 2395-2400.
    [11] Stary A, Najim B, Lee HH. Vulval swabs as alternative specimens for ligase chain reaction detection of genital chlamydial infection in women[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1997,35(4): 836-838.
    [12] Hook EW 3rd, Smith K, Mullen C, et al. Diagnosis of genitourinary chlamydia trachomatis infections by using the ligase chain reaction on patient-obtained vaginal swabs[J]. J Clin Microbiol,1997,35(8): 2133-2135.
    [13] Berg ES, Anestad G, Moi H, et al. False-negative results of a ligase chain reaction assay to detect chlamydia trachomatis due to inhibitors in urine[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis,1997,16(10): 727-731.
    [14] de Barbeyrac B, Rodriguez P, Dutilh B, et al. Detection of chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction compared with polymerase chain reaction and cell culture in urogenital specimens[J]. Genitourin Med, 1995,71(6): 382-386.
    [15] Ridgway GL, Mumtaz G, Robinson AJ, et al. Comparison of the ligase chain reaction with cell culture for the diagnosis of chlamydia trachomatis infection in women[J]. Clin Pathol, 1996,49(2): 116-119.
    [16] Braverman PK, Schwarz DF, Mph M, et al. Use of Ligase chain reaction for laboratory identification of chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae in adolescent women[J]. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol, 2002,15(1): 37-41.
    [17] Peng XB, Zeng K. Ligase chain reaction for chlamydia trachomatis detection in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men[J]. J First Mil Men Univ, 2004,24(5): 184-185.
    [18] 韦红,吴仕孝,余加林,等. 连接酶链反应一酶联免疫吸附试验诊断沙眼衣原体感染的初步应用[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2004,27(5): 295-298.
    [19] 彭学标,曾抗. 连接酶链反应和细胞培养检测男性尿液中沙眼衣原体[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2005,23(2): 112-113.
    [20] 彭学标,曾抗,周再高,等. 连接酶链反应检测男性尿标本中沙眼衣原体[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2001,34(3): 184-186.
    [21] 王连明, 李晓光, Dayid Holland. 连接酶链反应检测沙眼衣原体诊断泌尿生殖系感染[J]. 中华临床医药杂志, 2003, 4(5): 13-15.
    [22] 邓春, 吴仕孝, 余加林, 等. 缺口-连接酶链反应-酶联免疫吸附( Gap-LCR-ELISA)检测沙眼衣原体的方法学研究[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2005,30(2): 183-186.
    [23] 郑荣涛. 应用连接酶链反应检测尿标本诊断女性泌尿生殖道的沙眼衣原体感染[J]. 国外医学皮肤性病学, 1995,21(6): 380.
    [24] 韦红, 吴仕孝, 余加林,等. 应用缺口-连接酶链反应检测新生儿沙眼衣原体感染[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2003,41(8): 578-581.
    [25] 刘开扬,李俊平,刘进军,等. Gap-LCR-ELISA法与PCR-反向杂交法对沙眼衣原体的检测的对比研究[J]. 中华检验医学杂志, 2007,30(7): 820.
    [26] Chen FP, Guan JL. Ligase chain reaction and cell culture in detecting chamydia trachomatis[2011.8.27][EB/OL].http: //www.17baba.com/infor/show_document_detail.asp?id=10849.
    [27] Lee HH, Chernesky MA, Schachter J, et al. Diagnosis of chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine[J]. Lancet, 1995,345(8944): 213-216.
    [28] Miller SW, Sinha D, Slate EH, et al. Bayesian adaptation of the summary ROC curve method for meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance[J]. J Data Sci, 2009,7(3): 349-364.
    [29] Tackmann R, Schuetz G, Hamm B, et al. Quality of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: STARD(standards for the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies)[J]. Rofo, 2010, 182(8): 655-659.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  186
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  403
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2011-10-07
  • 发布日期:  2012-08-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回