高级检索
    靳立军, 王宗涛. 在高风险冠脉介入患者中IABP与Impella 2.5对血流动力学支持的对比研究[J]. 循证医学, 2013, 13(6): 330-333. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2013.06.011
    引用本文: 靳立军, 王宗涛. 在高风险冠脉介入患者中IABP与Impella 2.5对血流动力学支持的对比研究[J]. 循证医学, 2013, 13(6): 330-333. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2013.06.011
    shu
    JIN Li-jun, WANG Zong-tao. A Comparative Study of Hemodynamic Support with Impella 2.5 Versus Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2013, 13(6): 330-333. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2013.06.011
    Citation: JIN Li-jun, WANG Zong-tao. A Comparative Study of Hemodynamic Support with Impella 2.5 Versus Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2013, 13(6): 330-333. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2013.06.011
    shu

    在高风险冠脉介入患者中IABP与Impella 2.5对血流动力学支持的对比研究

    A Comparative Study of Hemodynamic Support with Impella 2.5 Versus Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

      摘要
    • 摘要: 如何解决心血管疾病终末期、急危重症低排心血量,帮助患者恢复心功能,一直是心内、心外及重症监护室医生探讨的热点。目前认为,除了积极药物治疗外,部分患者需要给予心肌一定的恢复时间,因此在很多患者需要借助球囊反搏术、左心辅助装置等,为心肌恢复提供时间。

       

      • HTML全文
      • 参考文献(7)
      • 相关文章
      • 施引文献
    • 资源附件(0)

    /

    返回文章
    返回