李吉, 孙家忠, 李广森, 戴婧. 依帕司他治疗糖尿病肾病的系统评价[J]. 循证医学, 2014, 14(5): 285-290. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2014.05.016
    引用本文: 李吉, 孙家忠, 李广森, 戴婧. 依帕司他治疗糖尿病肾病的系统评价[J]. 循证医学, 2014, 14(5): 285-290. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2014.05.016
    LI Ji, SUN Jia-zhong, LI Guang-sen, DAI Jing. Epalrestat for Diabetic Nephropathy: A Systematic Review[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2014, 14(5): 285-290. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2014.05.016
    Citation: LI Ji, SUN Jia-zhong, LI Guang-sen, DAI Jing. Epalrestat for Diabetic Nephropathy: A Systematic Review[J]. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2014, 14(5): 285-290. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5144.2014.05.016

    依帕司他治疗糖尿病肾病的系统评价

    Epalrestat for Diabetic Nephropathy: A Systematic Review

    • 摘要: 目的 评价依帕司他治疗糖尿病肾病的疗效与安全性。 方法 计算机检索中国期刊全文数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、中文科技期刊数据库、万方数字化期刊全文库、PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE数据库,收集依帕司他治疗糖尿病肾病的随机对照试验。检索时限均为建库至 2013年8月,并追溯纳入研究的参考文献。由2位研究者按照纳入与排除标准独立筛选文献、提取资料和评价质量后,采用RevMan 5.1 软件进行Meta分析。评价指标包括:尿蛋白排泄率、血肌酐、尿素氮、24 h尿蛋白定量。 结果 共纳入10篇随机对照试验,合计 724例患者,其中试验组365例,对照组359例。Meta分析结果显示:依帕司他在降低尿蛋白排泄率均数差 -82.16,95%可信区间(-110.30,-54.02),P<0.000 01、24 h尿蛋白总量及尿β2微球蛋白水平方面优于对照组,在血肌酐及尿素氮水平方面差异无统计学意义。 结论 依帕司他治疗糖尿病肾病疗效明显优于常规治疗。但由于纳入的高质量文献很少,样本量有限,仍需进一步深入研究。

       

      Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Epalrestat injection for diabetic nephropathy. Methods We searched the following databases: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP and CBM to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Epalrestat curing diabetic nephropathy from inception to August 2013.References of included studies were also retrieved.Two reviewers independently screened studies according to exclusion and inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality.Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software.Results The literature included 10 RCTs with a total of 724 cases.Among them, 365 cases belonged to the treatment group and the control group included 359 patients.The results of meta-analyses indicated that Epalrestat was superior to routine treatment in decreasing UAERMD=-82.16,95%CI (-110.30, -54.02), P< 0.000 01, 24 hours total urinary protein and urine β 2-MG/Cr level, but there is no significant difference in the level of SCr and BUN. Conclusion The treatment of the diabetic nephropathy of Epalrestat is superior to the conventional therapy.However, because of few high quality literature and limited sample size, further study is needed.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回